Ye Olde Rocket Forum

Go Back   Ye Olde Rocket Forum > Work Bench > Projects
User Name
Password
Auctions Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts Search Mark Forums Read


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-20-2008, 04:10 PM
Race58 Race58 is offline
Craftsman
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 338
Default Aerotech G-Force Ejection charge question.

I have built an Aerotech G-Force to use for Mid Power. This is my first venture into Mid Power so I have read and asked questions about it.
I decided to upgrade a little so I replaced the coupler with a longer and thicker (8") one from GLR using the existing one to beef up the rear tube aft of the motor. I also swapped out the composite forward bulkhead and screw eye for a 3/32 ply and u-bolt. I went with 12' of 1/4" Tublar kevlar,5' of 9/16 Tubular nylon and a small piece of the original 5/8" elastic attached to a 48" Sperachute with a kevlar chute protector. All of this was connected with quick links. I also added removable rivets to the coupler/lower body tube and to the nosecone to upper body tube to be able to remove them later when I add a camera.

In doing this I figured that I should ground test the ejection charge to see if the upper section and the laundry will deploy properly.

That's where I found a problem. I tried the test by loading the charge for a "G" motor into the fwd closure of my 29mm case along with an ignitor.
When the ejection charge fired the upper section it only moved up the coupler about 2-3 inches. See video here:


I tried packing things inside tighter to make them more loose (even though they were already loose enough I thought)and tried again with same result.
The upper section is not too tight on the coupler in my estimation. When I pick up the rocket by the upper section the bottom slides easy off and when I turn it nose down it stays put.

Maybe I'm missing something so I'm asking here. I am glad that I did this first because they way it seems that if I had loaded the motor and just flew it probably would not have ended well.

I have searched but could not find any reference to mid power ground test's only high power. Not that they aren't there I just could find any. Probably the same and seems that adding more BP to the ejection does the trick. I could try that but what about the SU motors? You can't change them.

In looking at the video I noticed a lot of ejection and flame thru the aft closure. Could the lack of back pressure (Empty casing) be the problem?

Thanks for any help.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-20-2008, 04:30 PM
jadebox's Avatar
jadebox jadebox is offline
Roger Smith/JonRocket.com
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Oviedo, FL
Posts: 1,007
Default

Quote:
In looking at the video I noticed a lot of ejection and flame thru the aft closure. Could the lack of back pressure (Empty casing) be the problem?


I'm pretty sure that's the problem. I flew my G Force a dozen times and the parachute never failed to deploy using the standard ejection charges in the Aerotech motors.

-- Roger
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-20-2008, 04:30 PM
Shreadvector's Avatar
Shreadvector Shreadvector is offline
Launching since 1970.
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Southern California
Posts: 2,188
Default

__________________
-Fred Shecter NAR 20117 (L2)
Southern California Rocket Association, NAR Section 430
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:24 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Ye Olde Rocket Shoppe © 1998-2024