Ye Olde Rocket Forum

Go Back   Ye Olde Rocket Forum > BARCLONE > Designer's Studio
User Name
Password
Auctions Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts Search Mark Forums Read


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-13-2010, 06:48 PM
CPMcGraw's Avatar
CPMcGraw CPMcGraw is offline
BARCLONE Rocketry
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Mobile, Alabama
Posts: 5,357
Exclamation New Design -- Freewind BG

Here's a glider design that I'm trying to morph into a pop-pod BG. The glider should fly as shown, with the CG at about 25%. The ballast weight is about 1/8th ounce, or one good ball-shaped fishing sinker. I'm going to build a couple of these to see if I can trim it for a good glide, then I'll work on the pod.

Notice on the 2D views the working margin value of 8769.28... RockSim says it's overstable.

Wingspan: 13.5"
Length: 12"
Weight: 0.472 oz

Enjoy!
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:  Freewind BG 2D Base View.jpg
Views: 103
Size:  80.3 KB  Click image for larger version

Name:  Freewind BG 2D Side View.jpg
Views: 108
Size:  79.3 KB  Click image for larger version

Name:  Freewind BG 3D.jpg
Views: 124
Size:  28.8 KB  
Attached Files
File Type: rkt Freewind BG.rkt (34.7 KB, 99 views)
__________________
Craig McGraw

BARCLONE Rocketry -- http://barclone.rocketshoppe.com
BARCLONE Blogsite -- http://barclone.wordpress.com
BARCLONE Forum -- BARCLONE Forum

BARs helping BARs

SAM 0044
AMA 352635
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-13-2010, 09:02 PM
JRThro's Avatar
JRThro JRThro is offline
BAR Wannabee
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: NW Houston, TX
Posts: 1,304
Send a message via MSN to JRThro Send a message via Yahoo to JRThro
Default

I really like the look of this one, Craig.
__________________
John Thro, NAR #84553 SR
I was too old when I started! Now I'll *never* become a BAR!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-13-2010, 09:14 PM
CPMcGraw's Avatar
CPMcGraw CPMcGraw is offline
BARCLONE Rocketry
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Mobile, Alabama
Posts: 5,357
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JRThro
I really like the look of this one, Craig.


Thanks!

I wish I knew more about BGs than I do. There's both an art and a science to them, unfortunately I'm neither an artist nor a scientist...
__________________
Craig McGraw

BARCLONE Rocketry -- http://barclone.rocketshoppe.com
BARCLONE Blogsite -- http://barclone.wordpress.com
BARCLONE Forum -- BARCLONE Forum

BARs helping BARs

SAM 0044
AMA 352635
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-14-2010, 12:40 PM
JRThro's Avatar
JRThro JRThro is offline
BAR Wannabee
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: NW Houston, TX
Posts: 1,304
Send a message via MSN to JRThro Send a message via Yahoo to JRThro
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CPMcGraw
Thanks!

I wish I knew more about BGs than I do. There's both an art and a science to them, unfortunately I'm neither an artist nor a scientist...

Yeah, you and me both. And I don't generally have either the time or the inclination to spend much time trying to refine things until they work right.
__________________
John Thro, NAR #84553 SR
I was too old when I started! Now I'll *never* become a BAR!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-14-2010, 09:33 PM
kevinj's Avatar
kevinj kevinj is offline
Not so Junior
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 436
Default

The one rule of thumb that I've always used is to have some stability inducing part of the glider be on both sides of the motor thrust line. I've done this by having the vertical stab under the fuse and the wingtips above the thrust line via dihedral. That said, I do like the looks of the glider.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-14-2010, 10:55 PM
CPMcGraw's Avatar
CPMcGraw CPMcGraw is offline
BARCLONE Rocketry
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Mobile, Alabama
Posts: 5,357
Exclamation

Quote:
Originally Posted by kevinj
The one rule of thumb that I've always used is to have some stability inducing part of the glider be on both sides of the motor thrust line. I've done this by having the vertical stab under the fuse and the wingtips above the thrust line via dihedral. That said, I do like the looks of the glider.


Kevin,

Behold... The Freewind BG Mk II...

Is this something of what you had in mind? I know the wing tips are not quite where you're describing, but I may have another idea for that...
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:  Freewind BG Mk II 2D Base View.jpg
Views: 88
Size:  79.8 KB  Click image for larger version

Name:  Freewind BG Mk II 2D Side View.jpg
Views: 81
Size:  78.9 KB  Click image for larger version

Name:  Freewind BG Mk II 3D.jpg
Views: 91
Size:  33.0 KB  
Attached Files
File Type: rkt Freewind BG Mk II.rkt (39.2 KB, 79 views)
__________________
Craig McGraw

BARCLONE Rocketry -- http://barclone.rocketshoppe.com
BARCLONE Blogsite -- http://barclone.wordpress.com
BARCLONE Forum -- BARCLONE Forum

BARs helping BARs

SAM 0044
AMA 352635
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-17-2010, 09:59 PM
GuyNoir's Avatar
GuyNoir GuyNoir is offline
NAR # 19250 - Life Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Woodstock, IL
Posts: 497
Default

More dihedral, man. More dihedral.
__________________
A dark night in a city that knows how to keep its secrets. But high above the quiet streets on the 12th floor of the Acme Building, one man is still trying to find the answers to life's persistent questions. Guy Noir, Private Eye.

Fox Valley Rocketeers: http://www.foxvalleyrocketeers.org
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-18-2010, 12:08 AM
CPMcGraw's Avatar
CPMcGraw CPMcGraw is offline
BARCLONE Rocketry
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Mobile, Alabama
Posts: 5,357
Exclamation Revised Plan -- Freewind BG Mk IB

OK, I'm listening about the dihedral issue.

The new Mk IB goes back to the original Mk I plan, but increases the wingspan to 14", and the dihedral to 15 degrees. The wingtip chord is shortened to 1.75", but the wing root remains the same.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:  Freewind BG Mk IB 3D.jpg
Views: 61
Size:  34.1 KB  Click image for larger version

Name:  Freewind BG Mk IB 2D Base View.jpg
Views: 56
Size:  80.5 KB  Click image for larger version

Name:  Freewind BG Mk IB 2D Side View.jpg
Views: 60
Size:  78.9 KB  
Attached Files
File Type: rkt Freewind BG Mk IB.rkt (35.1 KB, 58 views)
__________________
Craig McGraw

BARCLONE Rocketry -- http://barclone.rocketshoppe.com
BARCLONE Blogsite -- http://barclone.wordpress.com
BARCLONE Forum -- BARCLONE Forum

BARs helping BARs

SAM 0044
AMA 352635
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-18-2010, 12:16 AM
CPMcGraw's Avatar
CPMcGraw CPMcGraw is offline
BARCLONE Rocketry
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Mobile, Alabama
Posts: 5,357
Exclamation Revised Plan -- Freewind BG Mk IIIB

And here's the Mk IIIB, with the polyhedral tips. Same wingspan, but the first dihedral is now 15 degrees, and the tips have been adjusted to match the original 90 degrees (relative to each other).
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:  Freewind BG Mk IIIB 3D.jpg
Views: 51
Size:  23.5 KB  Click image for larger version

Name:  Freewind BG Mk IIIB 2D Base View.jpg
Views: 59
Size:  81.0 KB  Click image for larger version

Name:  Freewind BG Mk IIIB 2D Side View.jpg
Views: 52
Size:  79.3 KB  
Attached Files
File Type: rkt Freewind BG Mk IIIB.rkt (46.2 KB, 55 views)
__________________
Craig McGraw

BARCLONE Rocketry -- http://barclone.rocketshoppe.com
BARCLONE Blogsite -- http://barclone.wordpress.com
BARCLONE Forum -- BARCLONE Forum

BARs helping BARs

SAM 0044
AMA 352635
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-18-2010, 07:34 AM
gpoehlein's Avatar
gpoehlein gpoehlein is offline
Paper Rocketeer
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Evansville, Indiana
Posts: 1,181
Default

Mark IB looks good - but you still might want to flip the tail upside down - from my reading on the subject, that will increase the stability of the boost (right now it's like having three fins on one side of the rocket and none on the other).

Mark IIIB looks sharp, but you might have too much dihedral in it. The sources I've studied on boost gliders (I don't claim to be an expert) have all said a total of 15 degrees is what you want - For example, if you have a three section wing (flat plane in the center and two dihedralled tips), you want each section to have a dihedral of 7.5 degrees. So, with your four section wing, you'd want each section to be 5 degrees from the next. The more sections of dihedral you have, the closer you are approaching elliptical dihedral (where the whole wing is just a smooth curve) Just for clarification, this is an example of elliptical dihedral:

http://www.ehobbies.com/pkz4700.html

If you haven't been there yet, you might want to check out the Rocket Boost Gliders Yahoo group:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rocketboostgliders/

A lot of the boost glider (from small gliders to RCRG) gurus hang out there and throw around a lot of good info there. I am just an unworthy novice compared to them!

Greg
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:25 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Ye Olde Rocket Shoppe © 1998-2024