Ye Olde Rocket Forum

Go Back   Ye Olde Rocket Forum > Weather-Cocked > FreeForAll
User Name
Password
Auctions Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts Search Mark Forums Read


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-21-2019, 08:29 AM
Ltvscout's Avatar
Ltvscout Ltvscout is offline
Ye Olde Rocket Shoppe
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 5,511
Default SpaceX Crew Dragon suffers anomaly

__________________
Scott D. Hansen
Ye Olde Rocket Shoppe - Your One Stop BAR Shoppe!
Ye Olde Rocket Plans - OOP Rocket Plans From 38 Companies!
Ye Olde Rocket Forum
Ye Olde Rocket Auction
WOOSH NAR Section #558
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-21-2019, 09:09 AM
stefanj stefanj is offline
Master Modeler
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Hillsboro, OR
Posts: 2,581
Default

I really wish they wouldn't use that vague BS language.

There was an accident. Something blew up.
__________________
NAR #27085 - Oregon Rocketry - SAM
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-21-2019, 09:58 AM
astronwolf astronwolf is offline
Master Modeler
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Northeast Ohio
Posts: 610
Default

I think the deliberately unclear "code" language is cute.
__________________
-Wolfram v. Kiparski
NAR 28643
TRA 15520
MTMA Senior Advisor
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-21-2019, 10:42 AM
tbzep's Avatar
tbzep tbzep is offline
Dazed and Confused
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: TN
Posts: 9,023
Default

I was taught at the fire academy decades ago that red/brown smoke is probably methyl-ethyl-bad-$hi+ and I should use the RLH factor (run like he!!). We were referring to tanker crashes/spills, but I think it would apply here.
__________________
I love sanding.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-21-2019, 12:52 PM
kapton kapton is offline
Craftsman
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 146
Default

Red smoke = N2H4. RLH is a good idea.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-21-2019, 02:41 PM
Bob Austin Bob Austin is offline
Junior Rocketeer
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 22
Default

This appears to be much worse. Looks like they have lost the spacecraft.


https://youtu.be/l9DVRIdA4GQ
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:  PAqPlin.jpg
Views: 51
Size:  65.9 KB  
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-21-2019, 05:47 PM
ghrocketman's Avatar
ghrocketman ghrocketman is offline
President, MAYHEM AGITATORS, Inc.
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 9,124
Default

N2H4 is always fun stuff.
Blended with glow fuel you can get about 50% more power out of a glow engine for ONE RUN.
After that the engine is SCRAP.
__________________
When in doubt, WHACK the GAS and NEVER touch the brake !!!
No Harm=NO Foul advocate

If you are NOT FLYING LOW in the left lane, you need to GET THE #$&@ OUT of it !

Yes, there is such a thing as NORMAL
, if you have to ask, you probably aren't
!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-21-2019, 11:03 PM
georgegassaway's Avatar
georgegassaway georgegassaway is offline
Contest, Sport, it's all good......
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Homewood, AL
Posts: 400
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Austin
This appears to be much worse. Looks like they have lost the spacecraft.

https://youtu.be/l9DVRIdA4GQ



In using info from my post on TRF in the SpaceX Falcon-9 Historic Landing thread:
https://www.rocketryforum.com/threa...12#post-1879013

….you could have also included the link to the thread on NASA SpaceFlight Forum that was posts above it:
https://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/i...p?topic=48003.0

And yes, it was destroyed. A crew would have been killed instantly. About the best that SpaceX can hope for is that this was a screw-up in test procedures, or otherwise unique to this test.

Second best something related to the fact that this was the DM-1 Dragon-2 (which launched during NARCON and docked with ISS, and landed safely in the Pacific 6 weeks ago), where possibly saltwater caused some unanticipated issue or even some kind of internal re-entry heating damage that went unnoticed somehow (I would expect they’d have stripped the outer panels off to inspect it though). NASA won’t ever re-use a Dragon-2 for a crew, but SpaceX is planning to re-use them for ISS resupply.

If it’s a Quality Control problem, bad. An inherent design problem, could be devastating (the COPV tanks are at well over 1000 PSI). Would go from a delay of months, to potentially a delay of years to come up with a new hardware approach that NASA would sign off on to allow crews onboard.
__________________
Contest flying, Sport flying, it's all good.....
NAR# 18723 NAR.org
GeorgesRockets.com
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:58 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Ye Olde Rocket Shoppe © 1998-2019