Ye Olde Rocket Forum

Go Back   Ye Olde Rocket Forum > Work Bench > Building Techniques
User Name
Password
Auctions Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts Search Mark Forums Read


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-19-2019, 03:34 PM
BigRIJoe BigRIJoe is offline
Intermediate Rocketeer
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 50
Default Body Tube Diameter To Streamer Diameter Ratio

I've often seen that ideally, a competition streamer has a width to length ratio of 10:1 I wonder if there is an optimum ration between the streamer width to length ration and a body tube diameter?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-19-2019, 08:50 PM
ghrocketman's Avatar
ghrocketman ghrocketman is offline
President, MAYHEM AGITATORS, Inc.
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 9,156
Default

Optimum for what ?
Not sure what you are actually asking ?
__________________
When in doubt, WHACK the GAS and NEVER touch the brake !!!
No Harm=NO Foul advocate

If you are NOT FLYING LOW in the left lane, you need to GET THE #$&@ OUT of it !

Yes, there is such a thing as NORMAL
, if you have to ask, you probably aren't
!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-20-2019, 07:07 AM
mojo1986's Avatar
mojo1986 mojo1986 is offline
Master Modeler
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Kingston, CANADA
Posts: 1,725
Default

I think there's probably an optimum length to body diameter. Within reason, width (and therefore length to width ratio) shouldn't matter much. Obviously there's a limit to the length of a streamer (of given thickness or 'bulk') for each tube diameter. And I've never investigated this, so I don't know what those limits would be.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-20-2019, 11:23 AM
astronwolf astronwolf is online now
Master Modeler
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Northeast Ohio
Posts: 626
Default

The optimum length to width ratio of a streamer is a metric for optimizing the descent rate of a model rocket under a streamer. Descent rate is a function of the mass of the model rocket (including mass of recovery device) and the "drag force" created by the streamer.

Streamer optimization studies were conducted over the last several decades all suggest that there is an optimum streamer size. More width = more drag and more mass. More length = more drag and more mass. A little streamer does hardly better than blow nose recovery. A huge streamer might be too heavy and the model rocket's peak altitude is compromised. Somewhere in the middle is an optimum range.

The body tube diameter doesn't even enter to this function, so it is irrelevant.
__________________
-Wolfram v. Kiparski
NAR 28643
TRA 15520
MTMA Senior Advisor
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:48 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Ye Olde Rocket Shoppe 1998-2019