Ye Olde Rocket Forum

Go Back   Ye Olde Rocket Forum > WOOSH - Wisconsin Organization of Spacemodeling Hobbyists > WOOSH News
User Name
Password
Auctions Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts Search Mark Forums Read


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-22-2013, 07:50 PM
Kevin Huddleston's Avatar
Kevin Huddleston Kevin Huddleston is offline
Thumbing my nose at gravity...
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 55
Default Fiberglass... why?

Yeah, I'm full of questions. What can I say? I'm 44 years old and still thirsty for knowledge!

So, fiberglass kits are considerably more expensive than non-fiberglass. What are the qualities associated with fiberglass that make it so desirable?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-22-2013, 08:15 PM
Jerry Irvine's Avatar
Jerry Irvine Jerry Irvine is offline
Freeform rocketry advocate.
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Claremont, CA "The intellectual capitol of the world."-WSJ
Posts: 3,780
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevin Huddleston
Yeah, I'm full of questions. What can I say? I'm 44 years old and still thirsty for knowledge!

So, fiberglass kits are considerably more expensive than non-fiberglass. What are the qualities associated with fiberglass that make it so desirable?

Fiberglass not.

http://v-serv.com/usr/kits/easyrider-38.htm

That's a kit that is also offered in fiberglass or similar kits from other vendors in FG. Not needed. That kit has experienced NO power limit. People have tried.

The same airframe has been tested to the limit of 54mm and 75mm.

http://v-serv.com/usr/kits/sonic3100.htm

Just Jerry
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-22-2013, 09:12 PM
luke strawwalker's Avatar
luke strawwalker luke strawwalker is offline
BAR
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Needville and Shiner, TX
Posts: 6,134
Default

For high power rocket motors, capable of much higher airspeeds than regular black powder model rockets, fiberglass is capable of sustaining much higher aerodynamic loads than can be sustained by standard cardboard tubing and balsa or basswood fins... (although thicker cardboard tubing and lite ply fins can also work, to a point... usually combined with improved construction techniques like through the wall fins and often with more substantial adhesives, like epoxy). However, plenty of high power rockets have been built and flown perfectly well using only thick balsa or basswood and thick cardboard tubing using regular wood glue... Fiberglass is NOT, by definition, REQUIRED for high power construction-- it's simply an option, like many other things-- another tool in the toolbox and useful in certain applications... depending on what you're trying to do...

Later! OL JR
__________________
The X-87B Cruise Basselope-- THE Ultimate Weapon in the arsenal of Homeland Security and only $52 million per round!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-23-2013, 08:06 PM
jadebox's Avatar
jadebox jadebox is offline
Roger Smith/JonRocket.com
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Oviedo, FL
Posts: 1,007
Default

Another advantage is that fiberglass rockets are very easy to build. There are no seams to fill; tubes and fins are easy to cut; tubes and couplers fit together very well; fiberglass retains its shape better; and fins are usually smooth without sanding, sealing, and filling.

A large fiberglass kit can be built and painted in a single afternoon. I've been building (and rebuilding) my large cardboard rocket for the past three years. :-)

-- Roger
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-26-2013, 07:58 AM
UPscaler's Avatar
UPscaler UPscaler is offline
AP burner
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Spring,TX
Posts: 113
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jerry Irvine
Fiberglass not.

http://v-serv.com/usr/kits/easyrider-38.htm

That's a kit that is also offered in fiberglass or similar kits from other vendors in FG. Not needed. That kit has experienced NO power limit. People have tried.

The same airframe has been tested to the limit of 54mm and 75mm.

http://v-serv.com/usr/kits/sonic3100.htm

Just Jerry


While that is a cool kit, if you really wanted extreme altitude out of 38mm minimum diameter you would want a shorter airframe. For and additional $25 you can get the Wildman Blackhawk 38, which is carbon fiber (I believe).

That being said I am not big on extreme altitude.


One of the biggest things I like about fiberglass is the fact that it is simple to use in construction. Don't get me wrong, I like a typical paper/wood rocket, and I like laying up fiberglass myself, but as far as ease of use, putting together a fiberglass kit is almost as easy as an Estes E2X model. And paint goes on smooth as silk as well.

Edit: I get my glasses next week. I didn't notice that the kit is 3 inch with a 38mm mount. My bad!


Braden
__________________
Active rockets:
Extreme Darkstar(HPR)
BSD 4" Little John(HPR)
Ultimate Darkstar (HPR)
5.5 polecat NIKE smoke (HPR)
Retired:
Estes Mosquito (Mini Brute)
under construction:
L1 5.5" Standard ARM
RIP Erik Gates. Your talents will never be forgotten.

Last edited by UPscaler : 02-28-2013 at 07:37 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-01-2013, 01:10 PM
PaulK PaulK is offline
BAR
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: WI
Posts: 1,847
Default

In addition to the items Luke points out, some folks like fiberglass simply because of its durability. Some fiberglass builds can withstand a very hard landing with no damage.

When not required due to airframe stresses, the main downside is weight, requiring more expensive motors.
__________________
Paul
If we weren't all crazy, we would go insane - Jimmy Buffett
NAR #87246 www.wooshrocketry.org
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-01-2013, 06:16 PM
Jerry Irvine's Avatar
Jerry Irvine Jerry Irvine is offline
Freeform rocketry advocate.
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Claremont, CA "The intellectual capitol of the world."-WSJ
Posts: 3,780
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by UPscaler
While that is a cool kit, if you really wanted extreme altitude out of 38mm minimum diameter you would want a shorter airframe. For and additional $25 you can get the Wildman Blackhawk 38, which is carbon fiber (I believe).
I have one. 29mm.

But:

http://v-serv.com/usr/kits/sonic165f.htm

http://v-serv.com/usr/kits/payloader.htm

My point is fiberglass is overkill. In MOST situations. Here's a clear exception:

http://v-serv.com/usr/kits/sonic100f-s.htm

http://v-serv.com/usr/kits/sonic100.run.txt

Just Jerry
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-01-2013, 06:28 PM
UPscaler's Avatar
UPscaler UPscaler is offline
AP burner
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Spring,TX
Posts: 113
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jerry Irvine

My point is fiberglass is overkill. In MOST situations..

Just Jerry


I wouldn't argue there! I've seen a 100% Stock LOC Caliber ISP fly on a K550 and do just fine.

I didn't know you had fiberglass kits! Looks pretty cool.



Braden
__________________
Active rockets:
Extreme Darkstar(HPR)
BSD 4" Little John(HPR)
Ultimate Darkstar (HPR)
5.5 polecat NIKE smoke (HPR)
Retired:
Estes Mosquito (Mini Brute)
under construction:
L1 5.5" Standard ARM
RIP Erik Gates. Your talents will never be forgotten.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-01-2013, 06:35 PM
luke strawwalker's Avatar
luke strawwalker luke strawwalker is offline
BAR
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Needville and Shiner, TX
Posts: 6,134
Default

Here's another benefit...

I was feeding cows at Shiner a week or so ago... something caught my eye from the tractor in the area where I was feeding-- someone lost a rocket in that general direction from the launching site a year or so before, and I've always been curious as to where it actually landed. I rolled out the bale of hay and then went over and looked to see what it was... turns out it was a rocket... completely pristine-- not a scratch on it. Even the decals and paint were still in good shape. I picked it up and cleaned off the clinging dirt/grass bits from it laying out in the pasture for a long time, stuffed the shock cord back in it, and popped the nosecone back on. No motor casing, and the parachute was some distance away and the ripstop was badly sunburned and faded and disintegrating, but the rocket was in fine shape... it was fiberglass... Turns out it had been laying out there in the pasture for most of the fall and winter... luckily no cows stepped on it and I didn't flatten it out with the tractor driving through the weeds, but the exposure to rain, sun, and cold had virtually NO effect on it. I put it up for the owner to retrieve from its storage place at the next launch out there...

I was chopping weeds with rolling choppers yesterday afternoon at Shiner, on the front hill... something caught my eye about 20 yards away, so I stopped and jumped down from the tractor to go see what it was... turns out it was an Estes Stormcaster. A buddy of mine had said he'd lost one at the last launch he attended up there a few months back. The rocket was basically toast-- the tube was wet and collapsing and smooshed/warped, the fins were broken and turning loose, the plastic nosecone had either taken a hit or been stepped on by a cow and broke the shoulder off it, so even the cone wasn't salvageable... (sometimes the plastic nosecone is all you'll ever find of a crashed paper/balsa rocket after a few months on the ground... everything else eventually disintegrates almost completely...

Course, I don't like the WEIGHT of fiberglass... and the strength means its non-frangible, so if it malfunctions, whatever it hits gets perforated, because the fiberglass is NOT going to crumple like a paper body tube or balsa fins... and with the additional weight, impact energy increases substantially compared to an identical rocket using paper and balsa construction... plus as weight increases, larger motors become necessary to loft the heavier fiberglass versus that needed for the same size rocket using lighter paper tubing and balsa fins....

There's tradeoff's to it... not a simple "X is better than Y" type argument...

later! OL JR

PS. Thank goodness that fiberglass rocket didn't hit a cow... it would likely have killed her... (or hit anybody or anything else for that matter...)
__________________
The X-87B Cruise Basselope-- THE Ultimate Weapon in the arsenal of Homeland Security and only $52 million per round!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:36 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Ye Olde Rocket Shoppe © 1998-2024