Ye Olde Rocket Forum

Go Back   Ye Olde Rocket Forum > Work Bench > Projects
User Name
Password
Auctions Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts Search Mark Forums Read


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-24-2010, 08:17 AM
jamjammer53150 jamjammer53150 is offline
Maker of Shiny things
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 386
Default Sheris (red arrow) Little Joe

I got my LJ a few weeks ago , has anyone actually built one of theese things? on first impressions it is an over weight lunker , with some very tedious construction methods .

I have been building away , and modifying some things as some of the instructions , unless you are perfect will look like crap , or be so fragile as to be useless.

The nose cone is driving me nuts , the provided styrene is to thivk to make a cone that would resemble anything conical .

( i havent worked this out yet Im on my 3rd try ) I may just give up and use a funnel I found



Yhe fins built to spec would flutter into oblivion , you may as well tape cardboard on it.

I used 1/4 styrene rod rather than 020 stock in a few places


The tube is thick enough to hold 57 chevey off the ground andis next to unfinishable .

Since it has a corrogated styrene wrap , im adding another wrap rather than fight the tube fuzz

The CR's could probally hold an "M" motor

I sent them to jenny craig ...






Dont get me wrong , I really like it !
__________________
If it was easy , everyone would be doing it
www.jammer.com
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-24-2010, 09:03 AM
Brent Brent is offline
Level 3
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 292
Default

I built the Gemini Titian when she was producing the kits. The supplied tube was almost like a carpet roll tube. Very, very heavy. This is why I posted on one of the forums if he would consider replacing the tubes with phenolic or glassine coated kraft tubes. It took allot of filler and sanding to get it to look good. All and all it turned out decent. The kit was almost a scratch build with supplied parts. guess what hooked me on the kit was the nozzles. I have not flown it yet, for now it sets in my hobby/computer room. I imagine someday it will make its way to the rocket trailer a go to a launch. If something happens to it once it fly's I would probably rebuild it with a lighter body tube and a 1/24 scale Revel capsule. I am pretty sure that is what was used as a master mold for the resin capsule.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-24-2010, 09:10 AM
Doug Sams's Avatar
Doug Sams Doug Sams is offline
Old Far...er...Rocketeer
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Plano, TX resident since 1998.
Posts: 3,965
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brent
The supplied tube was almost like a carpet roll tube. Very, very heavy. (snip) It took allot of filler and sanding to get it to look good.
You only gotta build one of those to not want to go thru that again. The added effort costs way more than the few extra bucks for a real rocket tube.

Doug

.
__________________
YORF member #11
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-24-2010, 09:11 AM
brianc brianc is offline
Rivet Counter
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 173
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jamjammer53150
I got my LJ a few weeks ago , has anyone actually built one of theese things?

http://www.rocketreviews.com/review...le_joe_ii.shtml
__________________
brianc -- NAR 83726 \ TRA 11640 \ L2
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-24-2010, 09:24 AM
Doug Sams's Avatar
Doug Sams Doug Sams is offline
Old Far...er...Rocketeer
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Plano, TX resident since 1998.
Posts: 3,965
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jamjammer53150
I got my LJ a few weeks ago (snip) on first impressions it is an over weight lunker , (snip)
The tube is thick enough to hold 57 chevey off the ground andis next to unfinishable .
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brent
The supplied [Gemini Titan] tube was almost like a carpet roll tube. Very, very heavy.
Interesting. Over the past few years, there has been much discussion about Sheri and her (1)tattoos, (2)provocative avatars, (3) belligerence, (4) sexuality and (5) delivery failures, but I guess the quality of the kits got lost in all that other stuff.

I know it's Machiavellian, but the thought occurred that maybe all the above was intentional obfuscation

Seriously, the kits sound very un-appealing.

Doug

.
__________________
YORF member #11
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-24-2010, 09:27 AM
tbzep's Avatar
tbzep tbzep is offline
Dazed and Confused
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: TN
Posts: 11,626
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Doug Sams
You only gotta build one of those to not want to go thru that again. The added effort costs way more than the few extra bucks for a real rocket tube.

Doug

.


A 1/24 Gemini Titan would need a 5" tube, IIRC. It's been several years since I've done HPR, but I think the tube sizes jump from 4" to 5.5". One would still need to do some work to cut down a 5.5" tube, but it would be lighter and more smooth than the carpet log.
__________________
I love sanding.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-24-2010, 09:36 AM
tbzep's Avatar
tbzep tbzep is offline
Dazed and Confused
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: TN
Posts: 11,626
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Doug Sams

Seriously, the kits sound very un-appealing.

Doug

.


Other than the milled nozzles, I think one could be scratchbuilt about as easily as buying the kit and fighting with the tube. It sounds like the kit is just an assemblage of raw material that wouldn't be much more than what us scratchbuilders would start with anyway.

Take a 1/24 Revell Gemini kit and either beef it up to use as the nosecone, or use it as a mold to make a resin nosecone. Cut down a 5.5" or 6" paper tube, cut a few of your own centering rings, and turn a couple of wooden nozzles for display (or get Sandman to do that part). Slap it all together. Add as much detail as you are willing to damage during transport. Paint it, and add some trim monocote for the shiny stuff. Find a suitable decent looking tattooed lady with platform shoes to pose with it.
__________________
I love sanding.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-24-2010, 09:40 AM
Brent Brent is offline
Level 3
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 292
Default

Yea I know. The supplied carpet tube is actually about 5.25" in diameter. But as you said a cut down paper 5.5" Loc tube would be lighter probably even with a thin wrap of glass.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-24-2010, 09:42 AM
jamjammer53150 jamjammer53150 is offline
Maker of Shiny things
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 386
Default Well it wont break

One of the steps , is to make the nose cone (Shoulder?) out of a chunk of the left over carpet tube ( it is actually Uline concrete forms)

, anyway that piece alone weighs 2.2 oz , the main BT is 14 oz , 5 oz of CR's


g-40 ......

And if you watch the videos , theese things dont actually fly , they are simply thrusted and maintain a semi upright attitude .

The plans are excellent , I am not bashing it , just pointing out improvnebts
__________________
If it was easy , everyone would be doing it
www.jammer.com
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-24-2010, 09:44 AM
tbzep's Avatar
tbzep tbzep is offline
Dazed and Confused
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: TN
Posts: 11,626
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brent
Yea I know. The supplied carpet tube is actually about 5.25" in diameter. But as you said a cut down paper 5.5" Loc tube would be lighter probably even with a thin wrap of glass.



5.25"? I thought the Titan II was 10 ft diameter. 1/24 scale should make that 5".

The extra 1/4" adds another 6" to the full scale diameter.
__________________
I love sanding.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:52 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Ye Olde Rocket Shoppe © 1998-2024