Ye Olde Rocket Forum

Go Back   Ye Olde Rocket Forum > Work Bench > Building Techniques
User Name
Password
Auctions Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts Search Mark Forums Read


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #21  
Old 05-06-2009, 06:17 PM
BEC's Avatar
BEC BEC is online now
Master Modeler
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Auburn, Washington
Posts: 3,653
Default

Jay,

Hmmmmmm...... I have the most recent addtion of the Stine manual - 8th edition(?) (one of my BAR purchases)....I should've looked there! If rounded LEs only are worse than square then I have a Quest Astra (ready for fill and paint) and my Triskelion (in primer) and a FlisKits Whatchamacallit and dooHickey, Semroc Boid and an original (all in flying status) that are all set up "worst of the three". again.

scigs30,

I've started on a Star Stryker and noticed that the instructions say to round fin LEs but the pictures show square. Starting that build is what prompted me to finally "vocalize" this question after wondering about it for some weeks.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 05-06-2009, 06:21 PM
Jerry Irvine's Avatar
Jerry Irvine Jerry Irvine is offline
Freeform rocketry advocate.
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Claremont, CA "The intellectual capitol of the world."-WSJ
Posts: 3,780
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CenturiGuy
I noticed in the 3rd version of Stine's Handbook of Model Rocketry (it's what my public library has ) that rounded edges cause more drag than square ones, BUT airfoiled fins have the least amount of drag.

So when it comes to resistance, ranked from least to most, this is *apparently* how fin edges stack up:

1. Airfoiled
2. Square
3. Round


But yeah, it's because I'm lazy. *And* flat edges are easier to do if I've already attached computer label paper to the fins instead of using wood filler. Again, laziness triumphs.

As always, your mileage (or airspeed) may vary,


If it really says that then it is wrong.

Airfoiled, rounded, square.

I spent a year doing wind tunnel tests. Also I refer you to numerous reports published by the MIT Roc Soc.

Jerry
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 05-06-2009, 06:40 PM
BEC's Avatar
BEC BEC is online now
Master Modeler
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Auburn, Washington
Posts: 3,653
Default

Anyplace those tunnel test results were published (kind of like Mike Selig's model airplane Reynolds number airfoil work in the Soartech journals, perhaps)?
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 05-06-2009, 06:52 PM
GregGleason's Avatar
GregGleason GregGleason is offline
U.S. Manned Space Program Buff
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Houston
Posts: 1,298
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jerry Irvine
If it really says that then it is wrong.

Airfoiled, rounded, square.


Jerry


I believe Jerry is correct.

In my copy of G.H. Stine's 7th edition it mentions that a square fin tip, not leading edge, will have a lower induced drag than a round one.

Fin optimization for a given airspeed would take a LOT of CPU time. There a lot of variables that come into play:
  • fin geometry
  • airframe OD
  • airspeed

Greg
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 05-06-2009, 07:49 PM
Jerry Irvine's Avatar
Jerry Irvine Jerry Irvine is offline
Freeform rocketry advocate.
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Claremont, CA "The intellectual capitol of the world."-WSJ
Posts: 3,780
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GregGleason
I believe Jerry is correct.

In my copy of G.H. Stine's 7th edition it mentions that a square fin tip, not leading edge, will have a lower induced drag than a round one.


A rounded fin tip promotes vortex formation due to the ease of pressure differential equalization from surface to surface, and thus vortex drag which is induced drag since it is only attached to the body by a boundry layer and flow field.

A square edge reduces vortex drag, and an airfoiled tip makes the VD considerably lower and also lowers frontal area.

Fins like 2250 and Goblin with intentionally downward shaped, flat edges are designed to reduce vortex drag by sucking the vortex more into the wake of the body itself.

Airplanes use anti-vortex tips like little tails to break up most of the vortex power, but ask any pilot who has gotten too close behind a large plane, vortecies are still there and strong.

Just tech Jerry
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 05-06-2009, 08:08 PM
Bill's Avatar
Bill Bill is offline
I do not like Facebook
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: North Tejas
Posts: 3,101
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tbzep
One of the tricks used for Estes/Centuri catalog models to look really good in photos was to leave the edges square.



Is that because square edges stand out better in pictures, thus highlighting the fin shape?

I had always thought it was easier to make round edges look perfect whereas slightly unsquare (slanted) edges are easily noticed.


Bill
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 05-06-2009, 08:12 PM
o1d_dude's Avatar
o1d_dude o1d_dude is offline
Certified Rocket Monkey
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: The failed Socialist State of California
Posts: 551
Default

I round all the edges but don't bother with tapering the trailing edges.

Save that effort for my Hand Launch and Catapult Launch Gliders. =)
__________________
Kit (aka Cranky Kong)

I'm just a roadie for the banned...
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 05-06-2009, 09:03 PM
snaquin snaquin is offline
The_Ripper
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 1,941
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jerry Irvine
Fins like 2250 and Goblin with intentionally downward shaped, flat edges are designed to reduce vortex drag by sucking the vortex more into the wake of the body itself.

Just tech Jerry


Jerry,

I noticed many of the early sounding rockets seemed to favor this design. Mark Mayhle used this in all of the Lasor series kits and the NCR Hypersonic kits I had were also very similar in design. USR Stinger Two also comes to mind as a real drag cheater.

I prefer to sand an airfoil on the root, leading and trailing edges with a belt sander leaving the tip squared with the 2250/2650 design. It just looks right .....

My best performing rockets use this proven design

.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:  Steve Naquin T222-24 With Booster 3 D12-0 to 3 E9-6.jpg
Views: 123
Size:  373.4 KB  
__________________
Steve Naquin
TRA# 677 L2
NAR# 85518 L2
SAM# 0052

🚀 In Construction: Der Blue Maxx/Minie-Magg 5.5” & Vander-Burn MDRM Clone w/Stickershock23 Custom Decals
🚀 In Paint & Detail: USR Banshee
🚀 In Build Queue: Estes Doorknob w/Vander-Burn Rocketry Upgrade Kit [Sport Decor], Semroc Centurion-F, Semroc Egg Crate
🚀 In Repair: SLS Lil’ Hustler, SLS Aero-Dart 1969 Trim
🚀 Stay Tuned For Fall 2021 Launch Dates

Last edited by snaquin : 05-06-2009 at 09:54 PM. Reason: Added Image Plywood 2250 Airfoiled Leading & Trailing Edges with Tip Square
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 05-06-2009, 09:16 PM
STRMan's Avatar
STRMan STRMan is offline
Master Modeler
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 873
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nuke Rocketeer
A few years ago I used to help my kids' elementary school 6th grade do a science priject using model rockets every year. One year one of the kids questioned why he needed to airfoil the fins (We were building Alphas). I told him why, and proposed that half the class airfoil the fins and half leave them alone. We measured the altitude the rockets got on A8-3 engines and the airfoiled Alphas got significantly better alitude than the square edge Alphas.


Actually, these days, unless an airfoil or rounded shape is specified, I leave my fins squared for this very reason. I want my rockets back! I'm usually trying to hold down the altitude. Lower altitude usually means less chance a RET will get my birds.

If I was entering a competition, I would definitely make an airfoil shape on my fins.
__________________
"AND I hope they are from the planet of the "Chunk spunky Mary-Lou Retton clones". - Ironnerd

"Those who trade liberty for security have neither" - Benjamin Franklin

"Semroc is almost always the answer" - Stefanj

www.paulsavia.com

www.soundclick.com/paulsavia
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 05-06-2009, 09:27 PM
rokitflite's Avatar
rokitflite rokitflite is offline
Master Modeler
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 952
Default

I pretty much always round at least the leading and trailing edges of my fins... As a matter of fact, the ONLY ones I can remember leaving square are the ones on the "Pirates Booty" rocket I just built. The only reason I left them square was because the "blocky" look fit in with the scheme... I find it harder to do a nice, clean square edge than it is to round them
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:41 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Ye Olde Rocket Shoppe © 1998-2024