blackshire |
01-23-2020 12:14 AM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by frognbuff
Very nice test indeed! I wonder why they didn't do it at Max Q, as that would be the most stressing case.
I'm interested in reading more about the recovery operation. Dragon-2 has hypergolic propellants on the capsule, and those propellants react with sea water (ask any Russian sailor who crewed a Russian boomer with liquid-propellant SLBMs - at least two of those boomers sank during the Cold War). So interesting to confirm there were no issues with salt-water intrusion into the propellant system.
|
During the pre-launch coverage on SpaceX's "channel," they mentioned that the exact instant that the abort would be triggered was unknown, because it wasn't programmed (like the open-loop guidance that's often used early in the ascent of satellite launch vehicles [before going to closed-loop guidance, reacting to ambient conditions, later during ascent]). The announcer gave an approximate window a little after a minute after liftoff ("In less than ten seconds, the abort will be initiated"). The abort system operated in closed-loop mode--the on-board sensors, reacting to the conditions in flight, "decided" when Max Q had been reached and then triggered the abort. Also:
During the post-flight press conference, what you mentioned was brought up--that the abort initiation occurred, as far as they could tell, slightly after Max Q. I suppose it might have been a slight sensor "lag" or software mis-calibration issue, but the SpaceX and NASA folks said that they would look into it as part of the overall data analysis from the flight; in any event, it wasn't far enough "off-nominal" that any of them were disappointed by the results. As well:
I wouldn't be surprised, given the Super Draco thrusters' seawater-reacting hypergolic propellants, if the abort software calls for "burn to depletion," or else "sequentially vent all remaining fuel and oxidizer after abort burn shutdown," to prevent such unwanted reactions after splashdown. There may be (and, I imagine, there are) similar procedures for getting rid of residual Super Draco propellants after a normal re-entry burn and re-entry, for the same reason.
|