Ye Olde Rocket Forum

Go Back   Ye Olde Rocket Forum > Work Bench > Vendors
User Name
Password
Auctions Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts Search Mark Forums Read


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #51  
Old 09-01-2010, 10:27 AM
blackshire's Avatar
blackshire blackshire is offline
Master Modeler
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Fairbanks, Alaska
Posts: 6,507
Default

I haven't heard anything from Rick Piester one way or another regarding bringing back the Cold Propellant and/or Cold Power Convertible model rockets. It is possible that Estes no longer has the tooling to produce the motors.

However, at the very least they *would* be able to re-issue the Cold Power Convertible kits (Yankee-5, Shark, Teros, Scamp, Marauder, etc.) as regular 18 mm black powder motor powered rockets. (Estes did, in fact, sell the Teros and Scamp kits as "ordinary" rockets for several years.)
__________________
Black Shire--Draft horse in human form, model rocketeer, occasional mystic, and writer, see:
http://www.lulu.com/content/paperba...an-form/8075185
http://www.lulu.com/product/cd/what...of-2%29/6122050
http://www.lulu.com/product/cd/what...of-2%29/6126511
All of my book proceeds go to the Northcote Heavy Horse Centre www.northcotehorses.com.
NAR #54895 SR
Reply With Quote
  #52  
Old 09-01-2010, 10:44 AM
Jeff Walther Jeff Walther is offline
Master Modeler
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 661
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blackshire
I haven't heard anything from Rick Piester one way or another regarding bringing back the Cold Propellant and/or Cold Power Convertible model rockets. It is possible that Estes no longer has the tooling to produce the motors.

However, at the very least they *would* be able to re-issue the Cold Power Convertible kits (Yankee-5, Shark, Teros, Scamp, Marauder, etc.) as regular 18 mm black powder motor powered rockets. (Estes did, in fact, sell the Teros and Scamp kits as "ordinary" rockets for several years.)


Ah, thanks for the info. I went back reread the first post and see that this is more a general, what kits would you like reissued, rather than a, we're considering bringing back cold power. Still, it doesn't hurt to ask.

I had one Convertible model way back when. I think it was a Marauder. After the nozzle broke off of the cold power engine, I converted and I guess I lost it on a black powder flight at some point, because I certainly don't have it any more. Toys 'R Us stocked them back then.
Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old 09-01-2010, 10:48 AM
blackshire's Avatar
blackshire blackshire is offline
Master Modeler
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Fairbanks, Alaska
Posts: 6,507
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeff Walther
-SNIP-It occurs to me that if one replaced the pressure actuated prongs in the coupler with a $5 pressure sensor such as the Freescale MPX2202 and hooked up the output to a microcontroller such as the $1.25 Atmel ATTiny one could actuate pretty much anything upon motor exhaustion. For example, trigger a black powder charge for ejection, if one has inserted the cold power motor into a larger diameter conventional rocket. Or ignite a black powder upper stage...
The opposite arrangement (a black powder first stage and a longer-thrusting, lower-thrust Cold Propellant second stage or "sustainer") could yield a very high-performance bird. I don't know if Estes would want to get into such new product development (at least right now), though.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeff Walther
That's probably not stuff Estes wants to get into, but it's an interesting possibilty. If they would just sell a coupler that lends itself to user insertion of a pressure sensor, hobbyists could do the rest.
That would provide useful and versatile capabilities.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeff Walther
Hmmm. Are they considering reviving old stuff for which the tooling still exists, or are they considering new tooling as well? A larger diameter engine might be interesting, although I guess the nozzle would need to be bigger to support a higher thrust to lift the larger weight. Which would lead to a different nozzle plug, etc. Maybe not such a good idea.
Just "thinking out loud" here, in the NASA Wallops Island history book by James Shortal ("A New Dimension"), there is a short section on an educational steam-powered rocket (about 2-1/2' to 3' long) intended for school use that Admiral Robert C. Truax developed and tested at Wallops in the late 1950s. It included a launcher base that provided the boiling water for the rocket. It was a forerunner of the much larger steam rocket motor (not terribly unlike a great big Valkyrie motor) that powered Evel Knievel's Sky Cycle in which he attempted to jump the Snake River Canyon in 1974 (its recovery parachute opened somewhat prematurely, but the steam rocket motor worked just fine). An updated version of Admiral Truax's educational steam rocket would have interesting possibilities.
__________________
Black Shire--Draft horse in human form, model rocketeer, occasional mystic, and writer, see:
http://www.lulu.com/content/paperba...an-form/8075185
http://www.lulu.com/product/cd/what...of-2%29/6122050
http://www.lulu.com/product/cd/what...of-2%29/6126511
All of my book proceeds go to the Northcote Heavy Horse Centre www.northcotehorses.com.
NAR #54895 SR
Reply With Quote
  #54  
Old 04-18-2011, 08:26 PM
cerving cerving is offline
Junior Rocketeer
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeff Walther
Yes, I've seen some articles on line stating that the R13 4 is a good substitute. So I'm inclined to believe it. One article has the author's kid doing a school science experiment to see which of three (?) propellants will provide the best performance and R134 came out pretty close to the original R12. The methodology seemed pretty good. I don't have the link handy, but some Google fu would probably bring it up quickly. I think I was searching on Valkyrie the first time I found it.

So, if the R134 is good, that leaves, either the rocket propelled part of the Shrike was never worth a darn, or this old cold power motor isn't working properly any more (not charging fully?).

I think I had a Shrike, or the other rocket plane, as a kid and I do kind of remember that the rocket really didn't boost it any better than just giving it a good throw. But that memory is so old and overwritten that I'm not certain it's a true memory.

Anyway, is Blackshire still reading?

My opinion is that I'd love to see fresh motors of the Valkyrie type built. The Cold Power Convertibles were not nearly as good in my opinion. The plastic nozzle is used as an anchor point when filling the the Convertible's motor and that plastic nozzle tended to break off in pretty short order, as I recall.

For that matter, being able to get replacement parts/gaskets for the Valkyrie motor vents and the plastic nozzle extensions with the pin holes properly drilled would be great. Oh, and the plastic fin attachment stuff, and the launch lug material...

Been following this thread for awhile waiting to see if anything is coming...

I had a couple of V-1's, they were extremely cool. I used to use my Estes launcher (12 volts) to launch them with the bimetallic wire, as well as my black powder rockets. Been looking at this as an experiment, with different fuels, and some kind of small PTFE plastic bottle as the engine (alas, my Vashon engines are long gone...)

R134a isn't gonna happen, you can't vent it into the atmosphere AT ALL. The only exemption is for very small quantities, typically for medical inhalers where they need a non-toxic and non-flammable propellant. It's the only one left. N2O might work, but it has a nasty habit of reacting violently with anything reasonably metallic/reactible, and it has a vapor pressure of about 60 bar (vs. 6 bar or so for R-12). That's why it works so well as an oxidizer for hybrids. Diflouroethane (R152, "canned air") would be a reasonable substitute, the regulations for its release are somewhat vague and it is is wide use as an aerosol propellant so the miniscule amounts that us hobbyists would be using wouldn't amount to a hill of beans. HC's (propane, butane) would also work, but I doubt that the CPSC would look kindly at it, nor would the NAR/Tripoli people. Forget about compressed gasses like CO2, N2, etc, they're just too difficult to work with and you'd need very high pressures (> 100 bar, most likely) to get decent performance since they have much lower densities.

There have been some people out there playing with canned air rockets made of out Sharpie pens, etc., Google/YouTube it. Looks like fun. Anybody tried this on a bigger scale?
Reply With Quote
  #55  
Old 04-19-2011, 10:50 AM
jharding58's Avatar
jharding58 jharding58 is offline
Master Modeler
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Kennesaw, GA
Posts: 1,936
Default

One of the biggest problems with cold-power in high humidity areas is nozzle icing. You have the same issue with CO2 powered aircraft engines. Also the difference between wet and dry charges. Although - it would be rather nice to have an Atlas that really frosted in the right palces...

P.S. Commercial airliners at 40K plus trundled transtlantic for the last 40 years - in the Summer the high latitude routes place them within inches of the Arctic circle. Even now Concorde at cruise has a smaller "carbon footprint" than any subsonic aircraft in the air with the same route. The Ozone argument was a political expediency to prevent a "not built here" aircraft from dominating a market segment. It was the issue that cooked the Comet. DH lost two Comets to stress fractures because in 1952 no one fully understood the expansion cycle issues of pressurised cabins. Boeing read the DH research rounded the windows and buried the Comet in a sea of press even though the 707 went into service six years after the roll out of the Comet. Still and all, 707s would routinely drop engines. Also interesting that the only Concorde lost was caused by a DC-10 part - conspiracy theory anyone? Bueller? Anyone?
__________________
Gravity is a harsh mistress
SAM 002
NAR 91005
"The complexity of living is eminently favored to the simplicity of not."
Reply With Quote
  #56  
Old 10-06-2011, 03:44 PM
carbons4 carbons4 is offline
Craftsman
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 311
Default

Thank GOD I dont live near a coast. Got enough flakes moving here as it is. I think they should kick it up a notch and make small fusion drive motors. A little deuterium .............
Reply With Quote
  #57  
Old 10-06-2011, 09:55 PM
A Fish Named Wallyum A Fish Named Wallyum is offline
BP Mafia
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Ft. Thomas, KY
Posts: 8,623
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shreadvector
And now we turn this thread over to our resident off-his-meds poster who will post either a long or a short manifesto (I can hardly wait).

__________________
Bill Eichelberger
NAR 79563

http://wallyum.blogspot.com/

I miss being SAM 0058

Build floor: Estes - Low Boom SST Semroc - Marauder, Shrike, SST Shuttle

In paint: Canaroc - Starfighter Scorpion Centuri - Mini Dactyl Estes - F-22 Air Superiority Fighter, Multi-Roc, Solar Sailer II, Xarconian Cruiser Semroc - Cyber III

Ready to fly: Estes - Solar Sailer II Semroc - Earmark
Reply With Quote
  #58  
Old 04-27-2021, 09:02 PM
Ez2cDave's Avatar
Ez2cDave Ez2cDave is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Raleigh, NC Area
Posts: 1,743
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shreadvector
It has to be a liquid that is a liquid under pressure and turns to a gas at standard pressure. The rocket thrust is generated by the liquid turning to a gas and the gas is at increased pressure. As it changes state, it gets cold. It's a thermodynamics thing.


Nitrogen and Propane come to mind.

Dave F.
Reply With Quote
  #59  
Old 04-27-2021, 09:16 PM
blackshire's Avatar
blackshire blackshire is offline
Master Modeler
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Fairbanks, Alaska
Posts: 6,507
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ez2cDave
Nitrogen and Propane come to mind.

Dave F.
Liquid nitrogen has to be very cold (cryogenic cold) in order to be liquid, and propane is flammable. But, just as "inerted hydrogen" (a gaseous hydrogen/nitrogen mixture [95% N, 5% H, if memory serves]) is used for gas line leak-detecting purposes, propane might be mixed with one (or more) inert elemental or molecular gases, to make it effectively non-flammable while preserving its relatively high-temperature and low-pressure (as compared with nitrogen) transition from a gas to a liquid (which of course would be reversed when the Cold Propellant or Coldpower Convertible model rocket was launched).
__________________
Black Shire--Draft horse in human form, model rocketeer, occasional mystic, and writer, see:
http://www.lulu.com/content/paperba...an-form/8075185
http://www.lulu.com/product/cd/what...of-2%29/6122050
http://www.lulu.com/product/cd/what...of-2%29/6126511
All of my book proceeds go to the Northcote Heavy Horse Centre www.northcotehorses.com.
NAR #54895 SR
Reply With Quote
  #60  
Old 04-27-2021, 10:05 PM
blackshire's Avatar
blackshire blackshire is offline
Master Modeler
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Fairbanks, Alaska
Posts: 6,507
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeff Walther
Yes, I've seen some articles on line stating that the R13 4 is a good substitute. So I'm inclined to believe it. One article has the author's kid doing a school science experiment to see which of three (?) propellants will provide the best performance and R134 came out pretty close to the original R12. The methodology seemed pretty good. I don't have the link handy, but some Google fu would probably bring it up quickly. I think I was searching on Valkyrie the first time I found it.

So, if the R134 is good, that leaves, either the rocket propelled part of the Shrike was never worth a darn, or this old cold power motor isn't working properly any more (not charging fully?).

I think I had a Shrike, or the other rocket plane, as a kid and I do kind of remember that the rocket really didn't boost it any better than just giving it a good throw. But that memory is so old and overwritten that I'm not certain it's a true memory.

Anyway, is Blackshire still reading?

My opinion is that I'd love to see fresh motors of the Valkyrie type built. The Cold Power Convertibles were not nearly as good in my opinion. The plastic nozzle is used as an anchor point when filling the the Convertible's motor and that plastic nozzle tended to break off in pretty short order, as I recall.

For that matter, being able to get replacement parts/gaskets for the Valkyrie motor vents and the plastic nozzle extensions with the pin holes properly drilled would be great. Oh, and the plastic fin attachment stuff, and the launch lug material...
A factor that affected the Cold Propellant and Coldpower Convertible motors (it also affects black powder and composite [solid] propellant model rocket motors, but not to nearly the same extent) is the ambient temperature; the Cold propellant motors work better on warm days, and less energetically on cool or cold days. The Vashon Industries catalogs even recommended to--on cool days--hold the fueled rocket in one's hands in order to warm the fuel, so that its internal pressure (and thus the thrust) would be higher. Also:

I never had a Coldpower Convertible motor (its plastic nozzle/launcher lock-down *does* sound like a weak point, especially when the plastic is cold and more brittle), or even a Valkyrie 1 or 2 motor (their plastic nozzle skirts--I saw an Estes Valkyrie 2 Starter Set in a Titusville, Florida store in 1975--were made of a softer plastic, like Delrin, and they were easy to replace if necessary), just the aluminum motor (the XR 100) that powered the Estes Land Rockets (their rocket cars: http://www.ninfinger.org/rockets/no...a/76est044.html ) and also the Shrike and XS-1 Space Shuttle (see: http://www.ninfinger.org/rockets/ca...73/73est44.html ) rocket planes. (Incidentally, the Estes Sandpiper scale model [see: http://www.ninfinger.org/rockets/ca...74/74est44.html ] was originally a Vashon kit, as were the Valkyrie 1 & 2 and the Baron, Astro-Gnat, and X-13 parasite boost-glider kits; the Sergeant may also have originally been a Vashon kit.) But Vashon's tip worked; holding my Screamin' Eagle car's motor after fueling it on cooler days increased its thrust (and the car's acceleration) over what it did if I didn't warm it up first, and:

I'd love to see Estes--or another interested firm (Quest?)--produce updated V-1/2 (for first or upper stages, and strap-on boosters), V-1, and V-2 Cold Propellant motors, perhaps with a different pressure sensor to activate the recovery (or separation) system, although the original paper discs adjustable-delay system seemed to be perfectly practical. Plus:

The V-1/2 motor (or the smaller XR 100 motor) could be used to make an Estes Falcon-like *rocket glider* (RG), of the "propellant burn-off, weight-shifting" type (which has no moving parts or control surfaces). The fueled motor, on its forward pylon (with a nose cone, but no separation or parachute activation system, on the motor) would make the RG nose-heavy, and thus a ballistic vehicle. After its cold propellant was expended, the model's Center of Gravity would be shifted rearward (and its total mass would be reduced), making it glide.
__________________
Black Shire--Draft horse in human form, model rocketeer, occasional mystic, and writer, see:
http://www.lulu.com/content/paperba...an-form/8075185
http://www.lulu.com/product/cd/what...of-2%29/6122050
http://www.lulu.com/product/cd/what...of-2%29/6126511
All of my book proceeds go to the Northcote Heavy Horse Centre www.northcotehorses.com.
NAR #54895 SR
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:28 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Ye Olde Rocket Shoppe © 1998-2024