Ye Olde Rocket Forum

Go Back   Ye Olde Rocket Forum > Weather-Cocked > FreeForAll
User Name
Password
Auctions Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts Search Mark Forums Read


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-16-2022, 10:15 AM
Winston2021's Avatar
Winston2021 Winston2021 is offline
Master Modeler
 
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 976
Default How Did NASA Get Those Shots?

How Did NASA Get Those Shots?

"I've been wanting to do this video for a long time.... Just how did they manage to get those spectacular shots of the stage separations of Saturn rockets? Many have asked over the years, so this one is by special request for all of you who have wondered about just that. OH - and hang on till the end to see the jaw-dropping unedited footage."

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HBITROWVcok

The following is not mentioned in her video. It's too bad they stopped using the cameras with Apollo 8 because this would have been very interesting to see on film:

2010 JANNAF Lessons Learned Panel Discussion
(PDF of PowerPoint presentation)

https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/7d...97396ccf23d.pdf

NASA Apollo Lessons Learned

AS-510 (Apollo 15) Stage Separation

Lesson: There are NO Small Changes

Purpose: Increased payload to the Moon

Changes:

– Eliminate the ullage settling motors on the S-II stage
– Eliminate four of the eight retro motors on the S-IC Stage.
– Delay stage separation and retro motor firing by an additional 1 second to increase
separation distance.
- Effective: AS-510 was the first flight that incorporated the change.

AS-510 Stage Separation
Results of the Changes

Excerpts from the AS-510 Flight Evaluation Report:

- S-IC/S-II first and second plane separations were accomplished
with no significant attitude deviations.
- S-IC retro motors performed as expected.
- Separation distance was less than predicted.
- S-II exhaust plume at engine start resulted in a more severe
environment at the S-IC forward LOX dome and resulted in S-IC
telemetry system damage.
- Analysis indicates that with an S-IC stage having only four retro
motors, failure of one retro motor to ignite would result in marginal
separation distance and, in the 3 sigma case, re-contact of the two
stages.

Implication: We could have lost the vehicle!


AS-510 Flight Evaluation Report:

https://www.ibiblio.org/apollo/Docu...10-Apollo15.pdf

AS-510 S-1C/S-II stage separation. Note the lack of stage separation before S-II ignition and the plumes from the S-1C:

https://youtu.be/bvVtckdfmTE?t=2315
__________________
The other day I sat next to a woman who has a profound fear of flying. I wanted to comfort her, so I said, "Don't worry, we're not gonna' crash. Statistically, we got a better chance of being bitten by a shark." Then I showed her the scar on my elbow from a shark attack. I said, "I got this when my plane went down off of Florida." - Dennis Regan
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-16-2022, 10:06 PM
Bill's Avatar
Bill Bill is offline
I do not like Facebook
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: North Tejas
Posts: 3,104
Default

Those are spectacular shots, though I fast-forwarded through much of the time following S-IC separation to interstage jettision. I never knew the S-II flew that long with the interstage attached. If I ever get around to building a staged Saturn V, separating between the SI-C and the interstage is more accurate.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Winston2021
- Analysis indicates that with an S-IC stage having only four retro
motors, failure of one retro motor to ignite would result in marginal
separation distance and, in the 3 sigma case, re-contact of the two
stages.

Implication: We could have lost the vehicle![/I]


SpaceX has to learn a similar lesson the hard way in their early days:

https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna26061972


Bill
__________________
It is well past time to Drill, Baby, Drill!

If your June, July, August and September was like this, you might just hate summer too...

Please unload your question before you ask it unless you have a concealed harry permit.

: countdown begin cr dup . 1- ?dup 0= until cr ." Launch!" cr ;

Give a man a rocket and he will fly for a day; teach him to build and he will spend the rest of his days sanding...
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-16-2022, 11:09 PM
tbzep's Avatar
tbzep tbzep is offline
Dazed and Confused
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: TN
Posts: 11,626
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill
I never knew the S-II flew that long with the interstage attached.

I don't think it did. The Apollo stuff was filmed at 100 frames per second and normal film is done at 24 fps (30 for tv). If it was played back at normal movie speed of 24 fps, the video was a hair less than 1/4 speed of live action. I don't know if she also meant the frame rate for the Merc Atlas was 100 fps.
__________________
I love sanding.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-16-2022, 11:32 PM
Bill's Avatar
Bill Bill is offline
I do not like Facebook
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: North Tejas
Posts: 3,104
Default

At 100 fps, the video footage suggests around 30 seconds before interstage jettison. That is much longer than I had believed to be the case.


Bill
__________________
It is well past time to Drill, Baby, Drill!

If your June, July, August and September was like this, you might just hate summer too...

Please unload your question before you ask it unless you have a concealed harry permit.

: countdown begin cr dup . 1- ?dup 0= until cr ." Launch!" cr ;

Give a man a rocket and he will fly for a day; teach him to build and he will spend the rest of his days sanding...
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-17-2022, 12:38 AM
Bill's Avatar
Bill Bill is offline
I do not like Facebook
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: North Tejas
Posts: 3,104
Default

Subsequent reading confirmed the 30 second flight with the interstage:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saturn_V#S-II_sequence

That page also provides a couple of Saturn V variations to model. The Saturn INT-20 is an easy modification. The Saturn-Shuttle concept is visibly interesting, but may be difficult to make stable for flight.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satur...Apollo_proposal

Finally, an interesting story about the discovery of an "asteroid" covered with titanium dioxide:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saturn_V#Discarded_stages


Bill
__________________
It is well past time to Drill, Baby, Drill!

If your June, July, August and September was like this, you might just hate summer too...

Please unload your question before you ask it unless you have a concealed harry permit.

: countdown begin cr dup . 1- ?dup 0= until cr ." Launch!" cr ;

Give a man a rocket and he will fly for a day; teach him to build and he will spend the rest of his days sanding...
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-17-2022, 12:55 AM
georgegassaway's Avatar
georgegassaway georgegassaway is offline
Contest, Sport, it's all good......
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: West of Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 760
Default

The original scene, showing an S-IVB stage leaving, then igniting..... is not what most people assume it is.

It is NOT a Saturn-V launch, with S-IVB third stage separating from the S-II Second stage.

It is an early Saturn-IB launch (201 or 202), with the S-IVB second stage separating from the S-IB first stage.

The biggest visual clue, for those not familiar with the inside of a Saturn-IB interstage, is that the S-IVB ignites three solid "Ullage" rockets (about 120 degrees apart), that settled fuel into the tanks as the J-2 engine ignited. The Saturn-V's S-IVB only used two of those, about 180 degrees apart. BTW - those solid ullage motors were jettisoned right after they burned out, as dead weight no longer needed.

There were various camera pods ejected on Saturn-V flights, that were never found (off the top of my head, like 1/3 to 1/2 of them). One of those was an actual Saturn-V S-IB shot like the famous Saturn-IB one, but never found (it was way way farther downrange and a way hotter re-entry than that IB camera pod had to endure, so it ad long odds to begin with)

So many Apollo documentaries show that Saturn-IB staging footage as though it is a 3rd stage from a Saturn-V launch. But I can never really blame them, as it is such incredible footage, and is better to show than not (and sort of awkward to add "footage from a Saturn-IB" text into such a scene).

BTW - I'll note that I did not see the whole 30+ minute video, or scroll to the end, as for some reason in the last few months Youtube has made it impossible to scroll past stuff, for most videos that I watch (bizarrely I can do it on an Ipad easily, but not my "real computer" a Macbook running Chrome. But I used to be able to, and some videos I can but not most, whether monetized or non-monetized).
__________________
Contest flying, Sport flying, it's all good.....
NAR# 18723 NAR.org
GeorgesRockets.com
Georges'CancerGoFundMe:
https://www.gofundme.com/f/help-geo...ay-fight-cancer
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-17-2022, 01:56 AM
Bill's Avatar
Bill Bill is offline
I do not like Facebook
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: North Tejas
Posts: 3,104
Default

It is not clear what you mean by "scrolling."

I can click-drag on that red dot and traverse through the video at high speed without sound. I can hover the mouse over the timeline bar and see frames as the video continues to play.

I primarily use Opera as my browser with the built-in ad blocker turn on by default. I am starting to use Microsoft Edge for more things this year, but have yet to watch YouTube with it, so cannot say how it behaves.

The hovering over the timeline feature does not work with a few videos with no obvious reason why.


Bill
__________________
It is well past time to Drill, Baby, Drill!

If your June, July, August and September was like this, you might just hate summer too...

Please unload your question before you ask it unless you have a concealed harry permit.

: countdown begin cr dup . 1- ?dup 0= until cr ." Launch!" cr ;

Give a man a rocket and he will fly for a day; teach him to build and he will spend the rest of his days sanding...
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-17-2022, 10:17 AM
tbzep's Avatar
tbzep tbzep is offline
Dazed and Confused
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: TN
Posts: 11,626
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by georgegassaway
BTW - I'll note that I did not see the whole 30+ minute video,

She completely explained all of that about 8 minutes into the video including which launches had better footage (Apollo 4). She also mentioned the last flight with pods was Apollo 8, who's staging pods didn't survive, but the LOX pod did.
__________________
I love sanding.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-17-2022, 01:35 PM
Earl's Avatar
Earl Earl is offline
Apollo Nut
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 4,935
Default

I recall reading in some documentation over the years (NASA's "Stages to Saturn" book maybe?) that some of the film pods on various missions were sometimes not found for many weeks. Not sure if those lost that long still had usable film, but I think so. We will never know of course what footage we have missed from those pods that did not survive/were NOT recovered.

No doubt, some of that footage from those early Saturn 1b and Saturn V missions has become some of the most iconic of the early space age.

Earl
__________________
Earl L. Cagle, Jr.
NAR# 29523
TRA# 962
SAM# 73
Owner/Producer
Point 39 Productions

Rocket-Brained Since 1970
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-17-2022, 04:32 PM
rocketguy101's Avatar
rocketguy101 rocketguy101 is offline
frustrated aero
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Duncan, OK
Posts: 834
Default

I always thought this was a neat story... https://www.sandiegouniontribune.co...1231-story.html
__________________
David Stribling
NAR 18402 SR
But it is rocket science!
Get yer Barrowmans here
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:25 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Ye Olde Rocket Shoppe © 1998-2024