#11
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Guys let me qualify the statement above......... What Craig ment to say was that; "I got it back so unlike everyother glider I've built, it didn't gain altitude and fly away, so it just did a broad circle around the field and landed 10 ft from the launch pad.....") He is way too modest. I'm sure it flew like a dream.....just not like the X-15.
__________________
Bravo52 -------- Jerry Little TRA #11767 Level 1 |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Not too dreamy. I'd say Mr. Branche and Mr. Filler's Mach 10's fit that description. But your right, getting it back sure beats the heck out of watching it sail over the trees! |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
Hey, if it didn't immediately go vertical into a death-dive and take a core sample of the launch field, then it's a GREAT glide in my book, and it flew much better than any of my gliders usually do. (I haven't built my Mach-10 yet, though.)
MarkII
__________________
Mark S. Kulka NAR #86134 L1,_ASTRE #471_Adirondack Mountains, NY
Opinions Unfettered by Logic • Advice Unsullied by Erudition • Rocketry Without Pity
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
That Mach 10 looks great Craig!!! In a way I am glad is not one of your best gliders because all of your best gliders are not with you anymore... they always fly away!!! I am building one and was thinking about the canopy also. How would it look with a Fake Wulf canopy?... - Raul
__________________
_____________________ - Raúl NAR #88644 SAM #230 EAC CAT _____________________ |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|