Ye Olde Rocket Forum

Go Back   Ye Olde Rocket Forum > Weather-Cocked > Current Kit Talk
User Name
Password
Auctions Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts Search Mark Forums Read


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-04-2023, 10:47 AM
Scott_650 Scott_650 is offline
Master Modeler
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 624
Default 65th Anniversary Estes Rocket

Probably not the best time to bring this up - we’re all at least a bit salty over Estes and their move to MAP - but they announced a 65th anniversary rocket on the company FB page this morning.

It doesn’t look like any past model to me, the body tube resembles the pre-finished pearl white tube from the last anniversary Alpha III, the decal is definitely an updated, redone version of the prior anniversary decal, obviously it looks like a two-staged rocket and the nose cone is either the PNC-50BB used on the Black Brant III, Skywriter and Crossfire ISX or the PNC-55BB from the #1958 Black Brant II - I’d lean towards the 50BB cone. The fins look a lot like the #2452 Athena’s fins. And it looks like the “booster” (if it is a two-stager) has a faux nozzle or screw on retainer. My guess? It’s a mashup of the anniversary Alpha pre-finished BT-50 body tube, the PNC-50BB cone, Athena-style fins with a new design BT-50 booster unit similar to the OOP BT-60/BT-55 E2X Boosters . Probably going be an E2X kit, roughly the size of the Crossfire plus the booster unit, 18mm powered, overall length around 18”. But that’s just a guess based on some quick clicking around so we’ll have to wait and see.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:  CE7CE3CB-62CF-4B7E-A617-41FD7B36C9DD.jpeg
Views: 74
Size:  216.0 KB  
__________________
John Scott B.

NAR #102949/L1
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-04-2023, 10:56 AM
LeeR's Avatar
LeeR LeeR is offline
Retired with Way Too Many Kits
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Colorado
Posts: 3,222
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scott_650
Probably not the best time to bring this up - we’re all at least a bit salty over Estes and their move to MAP - but they announced a 65th anniversary rocket on the company FB page this morning.

[…]


I saw the FB ad too, and had the same reaction.

Thanks. But no thanks.
__________________
Lee Reep
NAR 55948

Projects: Semroc Saturn 1B, Ken Foss Designs Mini Satellite Interceptor
In the Paint Shop: Nothing! Too cold!
Launch-Ready: Farside-X, Maxi Honest John, Super Scamp
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-04-2023, 11:15 AM
astronwolf's Avatar
astronwolf astronwolf is offline
Lost his Drifter
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Northeast Ohio
Posts: 1,277
Default

I received an invite to join some new "Estes Rocket Rewards Program." The email promised, "Join our rocket rewards below to be the first to know!" I'm not on Face Book anymore. I wonder if the email announcement is similar to the FB announcement. The picture of the rockets was darkened.
__________________
-Wolfram v. Kiparski
NAR 28643 - TRA 15520
MTMA Section #606 President
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-04-2023, 11:34 AM
ghrocketman's Avatar
ghrocketman ghrocketman is offline
President, MAYHEM AGITATORS, Inc.
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Nunya Bizznuss, Michigan
Posts: 13,443
Default

This pricing strategy of Estes is the worst thing the company has done since they were ran by that toy company Yay-Hoo.
__________________
When in doubt, WHACK the GAS and DITCH the brake !!!

Yes, there is such a thing as NORMAL
, if you have to ask what is "NORMAL" , you probably aren't !

Failure may not be an OPTION, but it is ALWAYS a POSSIBILITY.
ALL systems are GO for MAYHEM, CHAOS, and HAVOC !
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-04-2023, 01:43 PM
BEC's Avatar
BEC BEC is offline
Master Modeler
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Auburn, Washington
Posts: 3,643
Default

Interesting.

Some thoughts: the 2452 Athena used a metallic blue Alpha III fin can. Those fins are more sharply swept.

The pearlescent tubing used on the Alpha VI (60th Anniversary model) is also used, in longer form, in the Ghost Chaser. And yes, that nose cone/tail cone look like the Crossfire ISX/Black Brant parts.

Since Alpha IV (40th Anniversary) and Alpha VI were E2X models that were essentially Alpha IIIs, it’s curious that this one looks like it might actually take a little more effort to build. But I don’t think it’s a two-stager just looking at it. The booster would be too short if the fins nested like the Checkmate.
__________________
Bernard Cawley
NAR 89040 L1 - Life Member
SAM 0061
AMA 42160
KG7AIE
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-04-2023, 03:04 PM
Scott_650 Scott_650 is offline
Master Modeler
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 624
Smile

Quote:
Originally Posted by BEC
Interesting.

Some thoughts: the 2452 Athena used a metallic blue Alpha III fin can. Those fins are more sharply swept.

The pearlescent tubing used on the Alpha VI (60th Anniversary model) is also used, in longer form, in the Ghost Chaser. And yes, that nose cone/tail cone look like the Crossfire ISX/Black Brant parts.

Since Alpha IV (40th Anniversary) and Alpha VI were E2X models that were essentially Alpha IIIs, it’s curious that this one looks like it might actually take a little more effort to build. But I don’t think it’s a two-stager just looking at it. The booster would be too short if the fins nested like the Checkmate.


You’re right, definitely not the same shape as the Athena/Alpha fins - I’m pleading lack of afternoon coffee for my mistake.

But I still think it’s a two stager - if it’s 13mm powered that little booster looks to be big enough for an A10-0. If not the lower fins look out of whack and oddly placed. Though that could be from the angle of the rendering - IIRC both John Born and Bill Stine have said almost all the static pix of Estes rockets are computer generated - so the physical rocket could look a bit different than the CGI picture.

Funny you should mention the Checkmate, I just finished mine last week and thought about flying it this morning in the park - decided to wait until the weekend so if we have decent weather I can fly it with my granddaughters. I didn’t care for the name so I rearranged the decal to spell MACHETE instead
__________________
John Scott B.

NAR #102949/L1
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-04-2023, 04:03 PM
BEC's Avatar
BEC BEC is offline
Master Modeler
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Auburn, Washington
Posts: 3,643
Default

Checkmate is my current favorite way to use A10-0Ts and (and A3-6Ts). As with most Estes rockets, the projected altitude is optimistic. Reality is ~700 feet when flown A to A, which is still a satisfying flight on a model that size. The booster tumbles properly and the streamer on the sustainer is enough recovery system for all but the hardest surfaces. I had to order a couple more in the mad rush to buy before the MAP thing hit.
__________________
Bernard Cawley
NAR 89040 L1 - Life Member
SAM 0061
AMA 42160
KG7AIE
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-04-2023, 05:26 PM
Scott_650 Scott_650 is offline
Master Modeler
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 624
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BEC
Checkmate is my current favorite way to use A10-0Ts and (and A3-6Ts). As with most Estes rockets, the projected altitude is optimistic. Reality is ~700 feet when flown A to A, which is still a satisfying flight on a model that size. The booster tumbles properly and the streamer on the sustainer is enough recovery system for all but the hardest surfaces. I had to order a couple more in the mad rush to buy before the MAP thing hit.


Dang it! Forgot to add those A10-0Ts to my Hobbylinc order…guess one pack will do till the next one.
__________________
John Scott B.

NAR #102949/L1
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-04-2023, 06:26 PM
Scott_650 Scott_650 is offline
Master Modeler
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 624
Default

Well. According to John Boren I’m wrong about everything about this rocket…and he should know!

So my research continues…🧐
__________________
John Scott B.

NAR #102949/L1
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-04-2023, 08:21 PM
BEC's Avatar
BEC BEC is offline
Master Modeler
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Auburn, Washington
Posts: 3,643
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scott_650
Well. According to John Boren I’m wrong about everything about this rocket…and he should know!

So my research continues…🧐

Yes, he should....

Where did he respond? On Facebox?
__________________
Bernard Cawley
NAR 89040 L1 - Life Member
SAM 0061
AMA 42160
KG7AIE
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:36 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Ye Olde Rocket Shoppe © 1998-2024