Ye Olde Rocket Forum

Go Back   Ye Olde Rocket Forum > The Golden Age of Model Rocketry > Plans & Publications
User Name
Password
Auctions Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts Search Mark Forums Read


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-10-2011, 05:54 AM
blackshire's Avatar
blackshire blackshire is offline
Master Modeler
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Fairbanks, Alaska
Posts: 6,507
Default Astrobee 350 fin dimensions?

Hello All,

Last night I was looking at my two unbuilt Semroc "Retro-Repro" Centuri Astrobee 350 kits (see: http://www.rocketreviews.com/review...robee_350.shtml ), and their fins just looked too small (compared to what I remembered from the old Centuri catalogs). This morning I looked through the old Centuri catalog scans on the Ninfinger Productions web site, and the fins on their Astrobee 350 kit (which they also called the "Aerobee-350" between about 1971 and 1975, during which years they added balsa strip conduits to the kit) were indeed *much* larger than the fins on the Semroc "Retro-Repro" Centuri Astrobee 350. Below are links to several images that show the larger fins.

(Also, before I get to those links below, I found that the Arcon-Hi's booster was also sold separately by Centuri for use with their Astrobee 350 and Payloader II kits, [see: http://www.ninfinger.org/rockets/ca...i65/65cen8.html ], so the Semroc Arcon-Hi booster could be used with Semroc's "Retro-Repro" Astrobee 350 and Payloader II kits to fly them as two-stage rockets.)

Do anyone here have the fin dimensions or a full-size fin pattern for the Centuri Astrobee 350/Aerobee-350 fins? I'd like to build my two Semroc Astrobee 350 kits with the correct-size fins. I would also share the fin dimensions or fin pattern with Semroc. Including these larger fins in the Astrobee 350 kits would eliminate the need for adding the metal washer weights to their nose cones (the EMRR flight logs reported "cartwheel" flights of the Semroc Astrobee 350, especially with heavier "C" motors.) Here are links to photos and drawings of the Astrobee 350/Aerobee 350 from the Centuri catalogs:

Centuri "Astrobee 350" (*without* balsa strip conduits)
http://www.ninfinger.org/rockets/ca...65/65cen10.html
http://www.ninfinger.org/rockets/ca...65/65cen20.html (in "Student Special" Starter Set)
http://www.ninfinger.org/rockets/ca...i67/67cen8.html
http://www.ninfinger.org/rockets/ca...i68/68cen8.html
http://www.ninfinger.org/rockets/no...a/69cenp18.html

Centuri "Aerobee-350" (with balsa strip conduits):
http://www.ninfinger.org/rockets/ca...d/71dcen26.html
http://www.ninfinger.org/rockets/no...a/72cen012.html
http://www.ninfinger.org/rockets/no...a/73cen022.html
http://www.ninfinger.org/rockets/ca...74/74cen22.html

I hope this information will be helpful.
__________________
Black Shire--Draft horse in human form, model rocketeer, occasional mystic, and writer, see:
http://www.lulu.com/content/paperba...an-form/8075185
http://www.lulu.com/product/cd/what...of-2%29/6122050
http://www.lulu.com/product/cd/what...of-2%29/6126511
All of my book proceeds go to the Northcote Heavy Horse Centre www.northcotehorses.com.
NAR #54895 SR

Last edited by blackshire : 01-10-2011 at 06:01 AM. Reason: This ol' hoss done forgot somethin'.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-10-2011, 09:58 AM
ddavis1 ddavis1 is offline
Junior Rocketeer
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 2
Default Astrobee 350 Fin Size

Hello, I had just finished building an Aerobee 350 and I too had this problem. I happened to find a drawing online done by G. Hary Stine showing the Astrobee 250 and 350. It did not give the specific fin size but it appears the width of the fin is 1 and 1/2 times the diameter of the body tube. Of course Centuri may not have used his drawing as a referance. I just scaled the fins up accordingly and it appears to be correct. I'm sure it will be more stable. I had an original Aerobee 350 and I can't see any differance from what I remember. I think that the Aerobee and Astrobee had the same fins but can't say for positive. I don't know if this helps but good luck in building your Astrobee's.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-10-2011, 10:27 AM
Chas Russell's Avatar
Chas Russell Chas Russell is offline
Retired Missile Technician
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 1,076
Default

I have a line drawing from Space General and the NARTS Scale Pak and the fin data agrees. Root edge against the motor is 50.0". Leading edge sweeps back 45 degrees. The trailing edge sweeps back 15 degrees. The tip length is 25". The individual fin span is 34.2". Root thickness is 5.7" and the tip thickness is 3.1"
Overall length from nose tip to the end of the nozzle is 473.62". Nose cone length 110.0". Diameter is 22.0". Payload section is 22.0".

Hope this helps.
Chas
__________________
Charles Russell, MSgt,USAF (ret.)
NAR 9790, Lvl 1
SAM "Balls Three"
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-10-2011, 10:29 AM
Chas Russell's Avatar
Chas Russell Chas Russell is offline
Retired Missile Technician
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 1,076
Default

NARTS is the NAR's Technical Services offering scale data and other NAR products. www.nar.org

The NARTS Aerobee 350 pak includes a color photo of the 350 and another of the Nike booster.

Chas
__________________
Charles Russell, MSgt,USAF (ret.)
NAR 9790, Lvl 1
SAM "Balls Three"
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-10-2011, 04:00 PM
blackshire's Avatar
blackshire blackshire is offline
Master Modeler
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Fairbanks, Alaska
Posts: 6,507
Default

I thank you both very much for your replies! I have a copy of "Rockets of the World: A Modeler's Guide" by Peter Alway, which covers the Aerobee 350. Since the full-scale Aerobee 350's fins were considerably larger in relation to its body diameter, I think scaling up the Astrobee 350 fin pattern in the old NAR Astrobee 350 plans (see: http://www.oldrocketplans.com/narts...250-350_104.pdf ) from the 13/16" body tube diameter to the 1.040" body tube diameter of the Centuri and Semroc Astrobee 350/Aerobee 350 kits would yield the correct fin size and shape (it *looks* right when compared with the Centuri catalog Astrobee 350/Aerobee 350 kit illustrations, in any event).
__________________
Black Shire--Draft horse in human form, model rocketeer, occasional mystic, and writer, see:
http://www.lulu.com/content/paperba...an-form/8075185
http://www.lulu.com/product/cd/what...of-2%29/6122050
http://www.lulu.com/product/cd/what...of-2%29/6126511
All of my book proceeds go to the Northcote Heavy Horse Centre www.northcotehorses.com.
NAR #54895 SR
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-11-2011, 12:36 AM
blackshire's Avatar
blackshire blackshire is offline
Master Modeler
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Fairbanks, Alaska
Posts: 6,507
Default

Another thing I just found--I compared the (under-sized) laser-cut fins in one of my two unbuilt Semroc "Retro-Repro" Centuri Astrobee 350 kits, and they are the same size and shape as the fin pattern in the old NAR Astrobee 250 & 350 plans, which specify the MMI 13/16" (0.8125") diameter body tubes (see: http://www.oldrocketplans.com/narts...250-350_104.pdf ).

The fins from the "Retro-Repro" Centuri Astrobee 350 kit could be used with the nose cone and a length of the body tube from the "Retro-Repro" MMI Aerobee-Hi kit to build a 0.8125" diameter Astrobee 350 or 250.
__________________
Black Shire--Draft horse in human form, model rocketeer, occasional mystic, and writer, see:
http://www.lulu.com/content/paperba...an-form/8075185
http://www.lulu.com/product/cd/what...of-2%29/6122050
http://www.lulu.com/product/cd/what...of-2%29/6126511
All of my book proceeds go to the Northcote Heavy Horse Centre www.northcotehorses.com.
NAR #54895 SR
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-11-2011, 08:09 PM
Carl@Semroc's Avatar
Carl@Semroc Carl@Semroc is offline
Junior ??? Rocketeer
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Knightdale, NC
Posts: 1,470
Default

James,
That is some detective work! It has taken a while to research this. Our Astrobee 350, in Peter Always words, is a " 1:1 scale model of a Centuri scale model of a non-existant rocket." Even though G. Harry drew the plans for an Astrobee-250 and Astrobee-350, Peter was unable to find anything that was ever produced that matched the plans. I think Centuri realized that as well, because between the 1969 catalog and 1971 catalog, they renamed it the Aerobee 350, but it was not even close to the actual Aerobee 350, which would have had the main body tube extended from 10.5" to 17.5" and increased the fin size even more. The conduits were added to make it closer.

When I did the Astrobee 350, my notes say I had a kit, but I cannot find it anywhere. The scan of the fins has been lost during a drive crash in 2003. I thought I had recovered all the archive data from it and the backup. I have a vector outline of the fin, but it looks too big (green outline below.) The current production fins are too small (dark blue outline.) The same scale ROTW Aerobee 350 fins (red outline) don't even look close. We are gling to change ours to match the light blue outline which is the correct scale for a 1.04" diameter to match Harry's drawing, which was probably the inspiration for Centuri.

Thanks again James for all your work tracking this down. I don't think we will release the same scale fins for a smaller tube since we would also have to release a new nose cone and tube and the confusion factor would be even greater.

We were considering a Deci-scale model of the Aerobee 350, but at 48" tall and BT-70 size, it would probably have a limited market.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:  astrobee350fins.jpg
Views: 107
Size:  296.7 KB  
__________________
Carl McLawhorn
NAR#4717 L2
semroc.com
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-11-2011, 11:30 PM
blackshire's Avatar
blackshire blackshire is offline
Master Modeler
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Fairbanks, Alaska
Posts: 6,507
Default

Thank you (and thank you for fixing the kits' fins), Carl! While there *were* Astrobee 200 and Astrobee 500 vehicles (see: http://www.astronautix.com/lvs/astrobee.htm ), Peter is right--no Astrobee 250 or 350 rockets were ever built. (That doesn't dampen my appreciation for the "Retro-Repro" Astrobee 350 kit in the slightest, though!) I think these never-built Astrobee vehicles were intended to use various versions of the 40" diameter Algol rocket motor (see: http://www.astronautix.com/stages/algol1.htm ), for the following reason:

The 13/16" (0.8125") diameter Astrobee 350 (and the shorter but otherwise identical Astrobee 250) "scale up" from G. Harry Stine's 1:49 scale drawing (see: http://www.oldrocketplans.com/narts...250-350_104.pdf ) to 39.8125" in diameter, which is just shy of 40 inches. (For reference, the largest of the Astrobee series which carried the Astrobee name [see below for an exception], the Astrobee 1500, was 31" in diameter. So were/are the various Super Chief sounding rockets [see: http://www.astronautix.com/lvs/supchief.htm ], which are also part of the Astrobee series. The 31" diameter motors were/are Sergeant or Sergeant-derived motors such as the Aerojet Junior, Castor I, and Castor II, which served/serve as second stage motors that were/are boosted by surplus Talos missile motors in the various versions of the Super Chief sounding rocket.)


-- Jason
__________________
Black Shire--Draft horse in human form, model rocketeer, occasional mystic, and writer, see:
http://www.lulu.com/content/paperba...an-form/8075185
http://www.lulu.com/product/cd/what...of-2%29/6122050
http://www.lulu.com/product/cd/what...of-2%29/6126511
All of my book proceeds go to the Northcote Heavy Horse Centre www.northcotehorses.com.
NAR #54895 SR

Last edited by blackshire : 01-11-2011 at 11:42 PM. Reason: This ol' hoss done forgot somethin'.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-12-2011, 07:33 AM
jdbectec jdbectec is offline
the middle-aged rocketeer
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Urbana, Illinois.....the birthplace of HAL
Posts: 468
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Carl@Semroc
James,
That is some detective work! It has taken a while to research this. Our Astrobee 350, in Peter Always words, is a " 1:1 scale model of a Centuri scale model of a non-existant rocket." Even though G. Harry drew the plans for an Astrobee-250 and Astrobee-350, Peter was unable to find anything that was ever produced that matched the plans. I think Centuri realized that as well, because between the 1969 catalog and 1971 catalog, they renamed it the Aerobee 350, but it was not even close to the actual Aerobee 350, which would have had the main body tube extended from 10.5" to 17.5" and increased the fin size even more. The conduits were added to make it closer.

When I did the Astrobee 350, my notes say I had a kit, but I cannot find it anywhere. The scan of the fins has been lost during a drive crash in 2003. I thought I had recovered all the archive data from it and the backup. I have a vector outline of the fin, but it looks too big (green outline below.) The current production fins are too small (dark blue outline.) The same scale ROTW Aerobee 350 fins (red outline) don't even look close. We are gling to change ours to match the light blue outline which is the correct scale for a 1.04" diameter to match Harry's drawing, which was probably the inspiration for Centuri.

Thanks again James for all your work tracking this down. I don't think we will release the same scale fins for a smaller tube since we would also have to release a new nose cone and tube and the confusion factor would be even greater.

We were considering a Deci-scale model of the Aerobee 350, but at 48" tall and BT-70 size, it would probably have a limited market.


I've got a built Centuri Aerobee 350 in the attic, in storage, I'll rummage around and trace the fin pattern and post it as soon as figure out how.
__________________
Jeffrey Deem
NAR16741
CIA section 527
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-12-2011, 08:06 AM
jdbectec jdbectec is offline
the middle-aged rocketeer
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Urbana, Illinois.....the birthplace of HAL
Posts: 468
Default

Here is a scan, and the measurments, as best as I could get them, this would be the final Aerobee 350 with the plastic cone.

And by the way the conduits were spruce or bass, not balsa. 1/8"x1/32?"x61/4", Bt length:10 1/2", Nose cone 5:1 ogive.
Attached Files
File Type: pdf scan0002.pdf (202.8 KB, 117 views)
__________________
Jeffrey Deem
NAR16741
CIA section 527

Last edited by jdbectec : 01-12-2011 at 08:31 AM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:25 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Ye Olde Rocket Shoppe © 1998-2024